Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houghton, A.
Right arrow Articles by Azam, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houghton, A.
Right arrow Articles by Azam, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Selective medical examination at school entry: should we do it, and if so how?


A. Houghton
, Consultant in Public Health Medicine
S. Egan
, Clinical Medical Officer
G. Archinal
, Clinical Medical Officer
O. Bradley
, Clinical Medical Officer
N. Azam
, Paediatrics

City and Hackney Health Authority London


Address correspondence to Dr. Houghton, at City and Hackney Health Authority Provider Unit, First Floor, Queen Mary Wing, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE.

A prospective study was conducted on 82 consecutive 5+ examinations performed by four school doctors over a period of two months. The aim was to assess the impact of applying selection criteria for examination. Information gathered included immunization status, history of previous developmental assessments and previous detection of problems, and the result of the examination for each child. Fortythree per cent of children were up to date with their immunizations, 66 per cent had had a six-week check and 38 per cent and 17 per cent had been assessed at 15 months and 21/2 years respectively. Forty-eight problems were detected in 37 children (45 per cent), of which 27 had not been previously detected. Of these, 19 were detected by the school nurse before the examination as a result of hearing (nine) and vision (10) testing and measurement of height and weight (one). Of the remaining problems, four were presented by the parent, one by the teacher and two were detected by the school doctor. If a policy of selective examination had been in place in which children were called for examination only if they had never been assessed before, or where there were no records of a previous assessment, or if their immunizations were incomplete, or they had previous problems, or the school nurse or teacher or parent had expressed concern, all but four children would have been examined. It was concluded that this particular method of selection would be unproductive and that a system whereby the school nurse was responsible for screening and selection for examination would be preferable. The merits of selective examination are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
J. Barlow, S. Stewart-Brown, and J. Fletcher
Systematic review of the school entry medical examination
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 1998; 78(4): 301 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.