Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Groom, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Groom, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

The care of people over 75 years old after discharge from hospital: an evaluation of timetabled visiting by Health Visitor Assistants


E. Idris Williams
, Head of Department
June Greenwell
, Research Assistant
Lindsay M. Groom
, Research Assistant

Department of General Practice, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham NG7 2UH
Department of Applied Social Science, University of Lancaster. (Formerly with South Cumbria Health Authority.)
Department of General Practice, University of Nottingham


Address correspondence to Professor E. I. Williams

The objective of this study was to evaluate a programme of timetabled visiting by Health Visitor Assistants (HVAs) to patients over 75 years old who were recently discharged from hospital. An outcome evaluation examined whether patients benefited in measured health status and use of services over the year of the programme. A randomly selected group of patients (the intervention group) who were allocated to the programme of visiting were compared with an equal-sized randomly selected group of patients (the control group) who had no timetabled visiting. A process evaluation examined the actions taken by HVAs during their visits and related the actions taken to patients' measured health status and other characteristics. No overall benefit from the programme of visiting was found in the outcome evaluation. There was wide variation in the numbers of actions recorded for different patients. Numbers of HVAs' actions were related to patient's health status and sex, with more actions being initiated for those in poorer health and women. Neither age nor whether the patient lived alone were found to be related to numbers of HVAs' actions. It was concluded that the lack of demonstrated overall benefit and the wide variation in actions taken on patients' behalf suggest that this type of service cannot be recommended for all discharged patients over 75 years. Poor health at the time of discharge is recommended as a first choice of measure for need of support. Exchange of information between general practice and hospital about previous dependency may aid the identification of patients who need post-discharge support.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
H. Schers, C. van de Ven, H. van den Hoogen, R. Grol, and W. van den Bosch
Patients' Needs for Contact With Their GP at the Time of Hospital Admission and Other Life Events: A Quantitative and Qualitative Exploration
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 462 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Elkan, D. Kendrick, M. Dewey, M. Hewitt, J. Robinson, M. Blair, D. Williams, K. Brummell, and M. Egger
Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis Commentary: When, where, and why do preventive home visits work?
BMJ, September 29, 2001; 323(7315): 719 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.