Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stirling, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wadsworth, M. E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stirling, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wadsworth, M. E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

The changing pattern of in-patient care


S. L. Stirling
, Statistician, MRC Scientific Staff
M. E. J. Wadsworth
, Director of the MRC National Survey of Health and Development

MRC National Survery of Health and Development, University College London Medical School, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 8BT


Address correspondence to Professor Wadsworth

BACKGROUND: A nationally representative longitudinal study presented the opportunity to describe National Health Service (NHS) and private in-patient care used over seven years by a population of young adults in relation to known risk factors for admission and for future health.

METHODS: Information on each hospital admission between ages 36 and 43 years, comprising length of admission and whether under NHS or private care, was collected from 1625 men and 1623 women, the population of the 1946 birth cohort study. Obstetric care was excluded from most analyses.

RESULTS: From this population, 22 per cent of men and 39 per cent of women were admitted to hospital at least once during the seven-year period, for a total of 11276 days, a mean of 3.5 days (SD 13·1) for each person in the study, and 11.6 (SD 21·9) days for those admitted. The proportion of admissions not under NHS care rose from 14 per cent of all admissions in 1982 to 23 per cent in 1989. Employers contributed to health insurance for 25 per cent of employed men and 7 per cent of employed women. Risk of admission was greater, and admissions were longer, in those least educated and from poorest circumstances; men with largest waist-hip ratios were admitted for longer than others. Private admissions were proportionately greater in non-manual classes and among those from favourable social and educational backgrounds, that is, those known to be at least risk of serious and chronic illness.

CONCLUSION: Heaviest users of in-patient care were those most likely to be at greatest health risk, who were least likely to have private health insurance. The rising mid-life uptake of private health insurance through employers (25 per cent of employed men by age 43 years) may foreshadow a future problem in a return to NHS care on retirement in this population, which represents the beginning of the future population bulge in the elderly.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJPHHome page
C. Zizza, A. H. Herring, J. Stevens, and B. M. Popkin
Length of Hospital Stays Among Obese Individuals
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2004; 94(9): 1587 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. A. Mustard, P. Kaufert, A. Kozyrskyj, and T. Mayer
Sex Differences in the Use of Health Care Services
N. Engl. J. Med., June 4, 1998; 338(23): 1678 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.