Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lancaster, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lancaster, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

The detection and management of hypertension in the elderly of Northamptonshire


T. Fahey
, Senior Registrar in Public Health Medicine
T. Lancaster
, Deputy Director

Oxford District Health Authority Oxford OX3 9DZ
General Practice Research Group, Department of Public Health and Primary Care Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE


Address correspondence to Dr Fahey

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to apply recommendations from randomized controlled trials and guidelines on the detection and control of hypertension in the elderly to a district health authority population.

METHODS: A cross-sectional audit of Northamptonshire general practitioners' (GPs') records from February to June 1993 was carried out.

RESULTS: A total of 2428 notes of men and women aged 65 or over registered with their GP was audited. A large proportion of patients, 86 per cent (95 per cent CI 84·6–87·4 per cent), had a blood pressure record taken in the last 10 years. Of those with raised blood pressure (BP≥ 160/90 mmHg) 49 per cent (95 per cent CI 46·2–51·8 per cent) were untreated, and 58 per cent (95 per cent CI 54–61·9 per cent) of those labelled as hypertensive were not adequately controlled. The prevalence of labelled hypertension was 25 per cent (95 per cent CI 23·3–26·7 per cent)

CONCLUSIONS: From these results is it estimated that between 11 and 29 fatal and non-fatal strokes could be prevented in the 65–74-year-old age population of Northamptonshire each year if current guidelines were followed. Improved detection and management of elderly hypertensive patients in primary care could contribute significantly towards the target for stroke reduction set in the Health of the nation strategy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M E Seddon, M N Marshall, S M Campbell, and M O Roland
Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(3): 152 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. Hillen, R. Dundas, E. Lawrence, J. A. Stewart, A. G. Rudd, and C. D. A. Wolfe
Antithrombotic and Antihypertensive Management 3 Months After Ischemic Stroke : A Prospective Study in an Inner City Population
Stroke, February 1, 2000; 31(2): 469 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Myers, S. Shah, A. Cook, T. Scanlon, P. Tarrant, M. Cranney, S. Barton, A. McColl, P. Roderick, J. Gabbay, et al.
Performance indicators for primary care groups
BMJ, March 20, 1999; 318(7186): 803 - 803.
[Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Kalra, I. Perez, and A. Melbourn
Stroke Risk Management : Changes in Mainstream Practice
Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 53 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
T P Fahey and T J Peters
What constitutes controlled hypertension? Patient based comparison of hypertension guidelines
BMJ, July 13, 1996; 313(7049): 93 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.