Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. M. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Infection control in general practice: results of a questionnaire survey


Ruth R. White, Senior Registrar
J. M. P. Smith, Consultant in Public Health Medicine

Department of Microbiology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital Liverpool L69 3BX
Department of Public Health, North Yorkshire Health Authority Northallerton Local Office, The Rutson, Northallerton DL7 8EN


Address correspondence to Dr White, Department of Microbiology, Blackburn Royal Infirmary, Blackburn, Lancashire BB2 3LR

BACKGROUND: Infection control is an important aspect of quality of care. General practitioners (GPs) have a high throughput of patients, some attending because of a communicable disease, others for investigations or minor operations. This situation provides an opportunity for the spread of infections. This study looked at the development of practice policies on infection control and the need for further information and guidelines.

METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to 117 practices in a single Family Health Services Authority. The questionnaire contained sections to be completed by a GP and a practice nurse in each surgery.

RESULTS: A response rate of 74.5 per cent was obtained. Of the practices replying, 85 per cent did not have a written infection control policy. Sterilization of instruments was carried out in over 90 per cent of surgeries. Autoclaves were used in almost four-fifths of these practices; most did not have any written procedures covering their use. Few practices provided information on procedures for infected patients or staff. A third of practices did not have a needlestick policy, and sharps incidents were not recorded in 42 per cent of surgeries. Three-quarters of practices said that they would welcome guidelines on infection control. Half of the practice nurses thought that more training on infection control was required.

CONCLUSIONS: The need for more training and the implications of the information from the study on the development and implementation of guidelines are discussed. Recommendations are made which aim to increase the awareness of this issue by means of guidelines and training focused on practice nurses.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
R. L. Atenstaedt, S. Payne, R. J. Roberts, I. T. Russell, D. Russell, and R. T. Edwards
Needle-stick injuries in primary care in Wales
J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2007; 29(4): 434 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.