Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atherton, F.
Right arrow Articles by Howel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atherton, F.
Right arrow Articles by Howel, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Psychological morbidity and the availability of assisted conception: a group comparison study


Frank Atherton, Senior Registrar
Denise Howel, Senior Lecturer

Bradford Health Authority New Mill, Victoria Rd, Saltaire, Shipley, West Yorkshire BD18 3LD
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, The Medical School Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH


Address correspondence to Denise Howel

BACKGROUND: Given its limited availability, it is worth while to explore the relationship between the non-availability of assisted conception and psychological morbidity among subfertile women, to see if those denied the procedure experience poorer health.

METHODS: A non-randomized group comparison study was carried out in Bradford Health Authority, England. Sixty-six women who had reached the point at which assisted conception was deemed appropriate, but for whom such treatments were not available, were compared with 49 parous women, and 73 newly diagnosed subfertile women.The General Wellbeing Index (GWI) was used to measure their psychological wellbeing.

RESULTS: Cases and subfertile controls have similar levels of wellbeing, whereas parous controls have significantly higher average levels than cases. This pattern is seen in the simple unadjusted comparison and also when adjustments are made for the distributions of age, life event score and social class.

CONCLUSIONS: Subfertile women experience poorer psychological health than similar parous women. Subfertile women, for whom assisted conception is an appropriate but unavailable treatment option, appear to have similar psychological health to those who are being investigated and treated by other means.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
R. Ardenti, C. Campari, L. Agazzi, and G. B. La Sala
Anxiety and perceptive functioning of infertile women during in-vitro fertilization: exploratory survey of an Italian sample
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 3126 - 3132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.