Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ayres, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ayres, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Major chemical incidents – a response, the role of the Consultant in Communicable Disease Control and the case of need for a national surveillance–resource centre


Philip J. Ayres
, Senior Registrar in Public Health Medicine

Wakefield Healthcare White Rose House, West Parade, Wakefield WF1 1LT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to discuss the adequacy of current arrangements for dealing with major chemical incidents through the offices of the Consultant in Communicable Disease Control (CCDC).

METHOD: This paper describes the public health response to an explosion at a chemical works which was followed by illnesses of unknown aetiology in emergency service workers and other people. An outline of the circumstances as they presented themselves and a description of the lessons learned from the management of this disaster are presented alongside an overview of the prevailing infrastructure of advice, support and training available to CsCDC. Key issues relevant to these areas are discussed.

RESULTS: A total of 181 potential cases were notified to the investigating team, of whom 115 had an illness possibly associated with the explosion. Of these, 93 suffered a gastrointestinal illness and 68 had so-called ‘toxic’ symptoms (eye, skin and bronchopulmonary irritation). Forty-six people had both sets of symptoms at the same time.

CONCLUSIONS: Current arrangements dictate that public health physicians have a role in incidents such as this, whether they seek such a position or not. The specialty would do well to consider developing formal disaster training schemes for those likely to have to manage major incidents (usually the CCDC), and would benefit from the setting up of a chemical-environmental incident surveillance-resource centre. Such a centre should have a remit for teaching and training, information support, incident recording, coordination of expert resources, and liaison between interested bodies both nationally and internationally.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
I Abubakar, G S Leonardi, N Edwards, and N Herriott
Inter-rater agreement in defining chemical incidents at the National Poisons Information Service, London
J Epidemiol Community Health, August 1, 2004; 58(8): 718 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
B Olowokure, P J Saunders, J A Dyer, and A J Kibble
Temporal and seasonal variation in the occurrence of chemical incidents
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2004; 61(2): 177 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
H J Bowen, S R Palmer, H M P Fielder, G Coleman, P A Routledge, and D L Fone
Community exposures to chemical incidents: development and evaluation of the first environmental public health surveillance system in Europe
J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2000; 54(11): 870 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.