Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitelaw, S.
Right arrow Articles by Green, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitelaw, S.
Right arrow Articles by Green, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Market testing specialist health promotion services – a test case for an imaginative public health presence in purchasing


Sandy Whitelaw
, Lecturer in Health Promotion
Kevin McKeown
, Lecturer in Health PromotionPromotion (and Manager, East Lancashire Public Health Resource and Intelligence Centre)
Felicity Green
, Lecturer in Health PromotionPromotion (and Deputy Director of Health Promotion, Stockport Centre for Health Promotion)

School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PT


Address correspondence to Mr. S. Whitelaw

This paper focuses on the current pressure being imposed upon health promotion services in the ‘North West’ Region in the form of ‘market testing’. It suggests that this is not only of concern to those services themselves, but may also act as a ‘test case’ for the examination of the range of competing perspectives that inform a purchasing function. The tensions between the views that respectively support or question the application of market values is thus examined in relation to the role of public health specialists within purchasing organizations. The paper concludes that although there is some potential to ‘sharpen up’ services, caution is required in avoiding unrestricted market values leading to superficial and fragmented health promotion provision. It is admitted that there are consequences relating to health promotion specialists. However, because of the close affinity between health promotion and public health, failure to protect health promotion from the harshness of the market and ensure a broad-based approach will not only be a set-back for hearth promotion but will also harm the status of ‘public health perspectives’ in the broader purchasing context.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.