Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Packham, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Packham, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

A survey of notified travel-associated infections: implications for travel health advice


C. J. Packham, Senior Registrar in Public Health Medicine

Nottingham Health Berkley Avenue, Nottingham NG3 5AF

BACKGROUND: Travel-associated illness affects at least 25 per cent of UK residents who travel abroad each year. Notified cases form only a small proportion of the total community burden of disease but nevertheless represent a substantial workload for community infection control services. The aim of the study was to describe the incidence of notified travel-associated infectious illness, the extent and sources of travel health advice, and the nature of risk-avoiding behaviour in that population.

METHOD: A questionnaire survey was carried out of 190 consecutive notifications of food poisoning and malaria over a nine-month period where travel abroad was an identifiable factor.

RESULTS: The incidence of notified travel-associated food poisoning during the study period was 204 per million resident population per year. Thirteen per cent of respondents reported taking no precautions against food poisoning, and up to 75 per cent of the cases could have taken better precautions. Only 36 per cent of cases recalled advice from their travel agent. Half the cases did not visit their general practitioner before travel (20 per cent of travellers to high-risk destinations). There was a strong association between receiving advice before travelling and risk-avoiding behaviour. The source of advice did not appear to affect the extent of precautions taken. The cases clearly expressed a need for additional written travel health information in the appropriate style and language for their ethnic group. Ethnic minority cases utilized official travel health advice to the same extent as the Caucasian cases.

CONCLUSION: In this case series, 75 per cent of travellers did not take sufficient basic precautions against infection. There was a need to improve advice about simple precautions to avoid infection. General practice was the commonest source of advice for the travellers in this study. The apparently low level of advice from travel agents needs to be addressed in any local initiative to improve the health of travellers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
M. Mckee
Travel associated illness
BMJ, April 13, 1996; 312(7036): 925 - 926.
[Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.