Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Dack, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Dack, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

The epidemiology of Down syndrome in four counties in Ireland 1981–1990


Z. Johnson
, Director of Health Information Unit
D. Lillis
, Consultant Paediatrician
V. Delany
, Research Nurse, EUROCAT Register
C. Hayes
, Epidemiologist, Health Information Unit
P. Dack
, Analyst-Programmer, Health Information Unit

Dublin EUROCAT Registry, Health Information Unit, Eastern Health Board, Dr Steevens Hospital Dublin 8, Ireland
Galway EUROCAT Registry, Department of Paediatrics, University College Hospital Galway, Ireland
Dublin EUROCAT Registry


Address correspondence to Dr Z. Johnson

BACKGROUND: We conducted a descriptive epidemiological study of Down syndrome (DS) in the four Irish counties (Dublin, Kildare, Wicklow and Galway) covered by EUROCAT registries of congenital malformations for the years 1981–1990.

METHODS: EUROCAT registries, which cover defined populations, use multiple sources for case ascertainment. All DS cases born between 1 January 1981 and 31 December 1990 to mothers resident in the four counties were identified. Crude birth prevalence rates and maternal agestandardized rates (SPRs) were calculated for each county and for each year in the study period. The prevalence of DS by maternal age grouped in five-year periods and the risk for each five-year group were also estimated.

RESULTS: The crude birth prevalence for the four counties was 18•5/10 000 for all births and 18•3 for live births. There was a fall in the total number of DS births over the decade, but less change in the crude birth prevalence owing to an increase in the proportion of mothers aged 35 + . Galway had the highest crude birth prevalence of DS (23•5/10 000) but the SPR was within average for the four counties as a whole - 110•3, 95 per cent confidence interval (Cl) 86•7–139. The risk of having a DS child increased 70-fold from 1:1841 at age 15–19 to 1:26 at 45 years or older. Nearly half of all DS cases (47•4 per cent) had at least one additional anomaly.

CONCLUSIONS: The parts of Ireland covered by EUROCAT have a high birth prevalence of DS births as compared with some other countries, but the maternal age-specific rates are not substantially different from those in large international studies.

Keywords: Down syndrome, epidemiology, maternal age, abnormalities


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
C Gardiner, B Lanigan, and M O'Keefe
Postcataract surgery outcome in a series of infants and children with Down syndrome
Br J Ophthalmol, August 1, 2008; 92(8): 1112 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
G Dean, N C Nevin, M Mikkelsen, G Karadima, M B Petersen, M Kelly, and J O'Sullivan
Investigation of a cluster of children with Down's syndrome born to mothers who had attended a school in Dundalk, Ireland
Occup. Environ. Med., December 1, 2000; 57(12): 793 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.