Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jathanna, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jathanna, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

The costs and effectiveness of surveillance of communicable disease: a case study of HIV and AIDS in England and Wales


Stephen Morris
, Lecturer in Health Economics
Alastair Gray
, Senior Visiting Research Fellow in Health Economics
Ahilya Noone
, Consultant Epidemiologist
Meg Wiseman
, Grants Officer
Sushil Jathanna
, Consultant in Public Health Medicine

City University Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Wolfson College Oxford OX2 6UD, UK
Public Health Laboratory Service 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK
Department of Public Health, North Essex Health Authority Turner Road, Colchester, Essex CO4 5JR, UK


Address correspondence to Mr S. Morris

BACKGROUND: In England and Wales, surveillance of communicable disease is carried out and co-ordinated by the Public Health Laboratory Service (PHLS). The surveillance of HIV infection and AIDS is undertaken by the PHLS AIDS Centre at the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre(CDSC). Epidemiological data derived from surveillanceare not, however, a free good: they are a resource with an associated opportunity cost and should therefore be open to economic appraisal along side other uses of healthcare resources such as medical interventions. This paper assembles information on the current surveillance of HIV and AIDS in England and Wales, and explores methods for performing an economic evaluation of such activities.

METHODS: An examination of the cost and effectiveness of the PHLS AIDS Centre's epidemiological surveillance mechanisms for HIV and AIDS in England and Wales was undertaken. The total costs of each component of surveillance of HIV and AIDS in England and Wales were calculated. Two categories of cost were estimated: peripheral costs incurred by reporters in reporting AIDS cases or HIV infections or by laboratories in collecting samples; and central costs incurred by the PHLS AIDS Centre in processing and analysing incoming data. Using these cost data and information from a cost-effectiveness register, the additional health gains that would have to be obtained from surveillance to make the programme broadly cost-effective in comparison with other accepted uses of health service resources were then estimated.

RESULTS: In the financial year 1993–1994 the total costs of surveillance were estimated to be £1•4 million. To avoid being considered relatively cost-ineffective at least 3•5 infections per annum need to be averted. To be considered favourably cost-effective, approximately 9•5 infections perannum need to be averted.

CONCLUSIONS: In 1993–1994, expenditure on surveillance of HIV and AIDS accounted for less than 1 per cent of the total allocation of resources to the National Health Service for all HIV and AIDS activities. Given these cost estimates, the number of infections which surveillance would have to contribute towards preventing in order to be considered cost-effective is low.

Keywords: surveillance, HIV-AIDS, cost, information


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. Nicoll, O N. Gill, C. S Peckham, A. Ades, J. Parry, P. Mortimer, D. Goldberg, A. Noone, D. Bennett, and M. Catchpole
The public health applications of unlinked anonymous seroprevalence monitoring for HIV in the United Kingdom
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2000; 29(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. O. Gostin, J. W. Ward, and A. C. Baker
National HIV Case Reporting for the United States -- A Defining Moment in the History of the Epidemic
N. Engl. J. Med., October 16, 1997; 337(16): 1162 - 1167.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.