Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birt, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Joyce, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birt, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Joyce, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

How should public health policy be developed? A case study in European public health


Christopher A. Birt, Lecturer in Public Health
Louise Gunning-Schepers, Professor of Social Medicine and (then) President, European Public Health Association
Andrew Hayes, EU Liaison Officer and (then) Secretary, European Public Health Alliance
Laraine Joyce, Executive Director

Health Services Management Centre, The University of Birmingham Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham B15 2RT
Institute of Social Medicine, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands
Association of European Cancer Leagues Brussels, Belgium
Institute of Public Administration Dublin, Ireland


Address corespondence to Dr C. A. Birt

BACKGROUND: Article 129 of the Treaty of Rome (as amended at Maastricht) gave new powers to the European Union (EU) institutions to develop and implement public health programmes at EU level. The authors were invited by the cabinet of Commissioner Flynn to assist the Commission by developing new policy proposals in certain specific areas.

METHODS: The approach was agreed with officials of the Public Health Unit (now the Public Health and Safety Directorate) in DG V. Working groups of experts were appointed to review policy options in five discrete areas. The experts were resident in 13 of the 15 current EU member states, and were employed in academic departments, in health ministries, in local government, and in nongovernmental organizations. Draft reports were presented to an evaluation panel of additional experts, whose comments contributed to the final report to the Commission.

RESULTS: The final report consisted of five main chapters, corresponding to the work of the five working groups. The recommendations were grouped into those for which implementation would be short term, medium term or longer term, and these were summarized as a Plan of Action.

CONCLUSION: Five criteria for good public health policy development were satisfied, but the approach used was excessively expensive and time-consuming. Some further lessons for future policy development work have also been recorded. This work provided a fascinating insight into the workings of the EU institutions.

Keywords: European, Commission, public health, policy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
J. Sibert and D. Stone
Injury prevention in the UK--the European dimension
Inj. Prev., December 1, 1998; 4(90001): S34 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.