Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sneddon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sneddon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Control of infection: a survey of general medical practices


Joan Sneddon
Syed Ahmed
, Consultant in Public Health Medicine
Elizabeth Duncan
, Chairman, Primary Care Audit Committee

Lanarkshire Health Board 14 Beckford Street, Hamilton ML3 OTA


Address correspondence to Dr S. Ahmed

BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were (1) to assess current infection control practice within general medical practices and establish a base line; (2) to identify potential infection control problems; (3) to assess the need for local infection control guidelines or standards related to general medical practice; (4) to assess the need for educational provision.

METHODS: A survey was carried out, using questionnaire and structured interviews, of all general practices (92) within a Health Board area with a patient population of 561 300.

RESULTS: Forty two (46 per cent) practices participated, serving 67 per cent of the patient population. Only three (7 per cent) practices had written infection control policies and only six (14 per cent) provided training on the subject. Thirty (71 per cent) practices had autoclaves; however, performance monitoring was poor. The majority of high-risk instruments were adequately decontaminated; of the medium-risk instruments, the auriscope speculum was the item most frequently inadequately treated [36 practices (88 per cent)]. Deficiencies were identified in treatment of blood spillage, and protective clothing provision was variable. The majority, 40 (95 per cent) practices, had systems to deal with clinical waste; however, only two (5 per cent) reported use of BS7320 sharps containers on domiciliary visits. Despite the recognized dangers, 23 (55 per cent) practices resheathed needles and only six (14 per cent) had first aid guidance for needlestick injuries. Only eight (19 percent) practices knew and recorded staff immunity to hepatitis B following vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS: Some deficiencies in infection control practice were identified and the need for policy guidance and staff training was highlighted.

Keywords: infection control, general practice, crossinfection, primary care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
R. L. Atenstaedt, S. Payne, R. J. Roberts, I. T. Russell, D. Russell, and R. T. Edwards
Needle-stick injuries in primary care in Wales
J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2007; 29(4): 434 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.