Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perrett, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perrett, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Specialist outreach clinics in Sheffield: a faster tier of out-patient provision for the patients of fundholding GPs?


Kevin Perrett
, Consultant in Communicable Disease Control/Consultant in Public Health Medicine

Department of Public Health, Rotherham Health Authority, 220 Badsley Moor Lane, Rotherham S65 2QU


Address correspondence to Dr. Perrett at 53 Endowood Road, Millhouses, Sheffield S7 2LY

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the activity of the many new specialist outreach clinics in fundholding general practices that have emerged since the introduction of fundholding in 1991, though it has been claimed that specialist outreach clinics have shortened waiting times for fundholders' patients. This study describes the activity of specialist outreach clinics in fundholding practices in Sheffield, focusing on comparative waiting times between fundholding and non-fundholding practices.

METHODS: A descriptive study was carried out using routine out-patient activity data and a listing of outreach clinics obtained from fundholding practices.

RESULTS: Thirty-seven specialist outreach clinics were established in fundholding practices by November 1994; 23 in surgical specialties. In 1994–1995, for gynaecology, orthopaedics and general surgery, the leading outreach specialties, 22.5 per cent of fundholders' first attendances were in outreach clinics. In those three specialties, 87.0 per cent of patients in specialist outreach clinics in fundholding practices vs 67.1 per cent in hospital clinics were routine appointments, and 17.4 percent vs 9.4 percent, respectively, were added to an in-patient waiting list. The proportion of first attendees seen in less than three months was 97.0 per cent in specialist outreach clinics in fundholding practices vs 88.1 per cent in hospital clinics; 90.4 per cent for the patients of fundholders who had outreach clinics vs 85.2 per cent for fundholders who did not; 88.1 per cent for all fundholders' patients vs 88.6 per cent for non-fundholders' patients.

CONCLUSIONS: The new specialist outreach service in fundholding practices in Sheffield is largely for surgical patients classified as routine patients. Although patients were seen more quickly in specialist outreach clinics, no overall inequality of waiting times between fundholding and non-fundholding practices was shown.

Keywords: specialist outreach clinics, ambulatory care facilities, family practice, waiting lists


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.