Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finn, L.
Right arrow Articles by Crook, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finn, L.
Right arrow Articles by Crook, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Minor surgery in general practice - setting the standards


Lesly Finn
, Senior Public Health Nurse, Communicable Disease Control
Sarah Crook
, Consultant in Communicable Disease Control

Directorate of Public Health, Dorset Health Authority Victoria House, Princes Road, Ferndown, Dorset BH22 9JR


Address correspondence to Mrs Finn.

BACKGROUND: A self-assessment tool was trialled to set a baseline for control of infection in general practice and to assess the nature and adequacy of infection control precautions in primary care settings with particular reference to minor surgery.

METHODS: A request for volunteers was included in a flier sent out periodically by the Communicable Disease Unit to all general practices in the county (n = 114). Eleven practices (9.6 per cent) volunteered to take part and an audit of infection control precautions was undertaken with the practice nurse and/or manager.

RESULTS: Of the 11 general practices audited, nine did not have a written policy for control of infection, did not have a separate, dedicated room for minor surgery, did not use protective clothing appropriately, used terry towels for hand-drying and reprocessed single-use only items. Ten used inappropriate methods to decontaminate heat labile items, seven did not record sterilizer processing cycles and five did not comply with HTM 2010 with regard to sterilizer maintenance.

Following the survey, minimum infection control requirements have been developed for future applications to provide extended minor surgery within general practice and these will be monitored at subsequent surgery inspection visits and through audit.

CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that there is little room for complacency with regard to standards of infection control in general practice. In view of the increasing shift towards primary care based minor surgery it would be helpful if minimum standards were to be agreed nationally.

Keywords: minor surgery, infection control, standards, quality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.