Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Millership, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Millership, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Distribution of stable iodine in a nuclear emergency - are we prepared?


Sally Millership, Consultant for Communicable Disease Control

Department of Public Health and Clinical Policy N Essex HA, Collingwood Road, Witham, Essex CM8 2TT

BACKGROUND: In the event of a nuclear accident health authorities are responsible for the provision of stable iodine to an affected population. Following an emergency exercise deficiencies in local arrangements were apparent, and a survey of other districts with nuclear reactors was carried out to examine alternative solutions to some of the practical problems created.

METHODS: Health districts in England and Wales and health boards in Scotland with nuclear sites within their boundaries were identified from literature supplied by the Health and Safety Executive, and a copy of their current nuclear emergency plans together with any field experience of their use requested. Information from the plans was extracted and categorized according to a pre-defined list of criteria.

RESULTS: Sixteen districts with 18 nuclear sites had plans for distribution of stable iodine. Plans concentrated on the population within a small area around the site; more remote populations and special groups such as those in the emergency services were rarely mentioned. The most common arrangement was predistribution of tablets to local centres for onward distribution by community nurses, police or the public. Predistribution to households was unusual, although two districts were in the process of redrafting plans to accommodate this. Two districts with operating reactors did not have any agreed plans. No district had any experience of use in a real situation and only two with operating reactors had attempted field testing.

CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable uncertainty and confusion about the best method of distribution, with significant omissions from the majority of current plans. This is exacerbated by a lack of practical experience and a failure to share exercise experiences.

Keywords: stable iodine, emergency planning, nuclear accident


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.