Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Body mass index: a comparison between self-reported and measured height and weight


Anthony Hill
, Director of Public Health
Julian Roberts
, Health Targets Monitoring Officer

South Humber Health Authority Health Place, Wrawby Road, Brigg, North Lincolnshire DN20 8GS
Somerset Health Authority Wellsprings Road, Taunton, Somerset TA2 7PQ


Address correspondence to Dr A. Hill.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index is used to measure obesity in individuals and to monitor trends in population obesity. Some observers use self-reported height and weight to assess body mass index; others use measured parameters. This paper reports on a study to compare body mass index when calculated from self-reported and measured heights and weights.

METHODS: A randomized postal questionnaire survey and follow-up clinical measurement study were carried out in a geographically defined population in the rural South West of England; subjects were 6000 residents of Somerset health district aged 16–64 years selected from the Family Health Services Authority register.

RESULTS: The response rate for the postal questionnaire was 57.6 per cent. A total of 73.3 per cent of responders agreed to clinical measurements; 84 per cent of measured volunteers had over-reported their height and 74 per cent underreported their weight. The difference between body mass indices based on self-reported and measured values of height and weight is highly statistically significant for the whole population and for most age-sex and body mass groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported heights and weights are unreliable and if used for monitoring health targets should be treated with caution.

Keywords: self-reported, measured, BMI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
A. Oliveira, E. Ramos, C. Lopes, and H. Barros
Self-reporting weight and height: misclassification effect on the risk estimates for acute myocardial infarction
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2009; 19(5): 548 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
E. R. Chasens, S. M. Sereika, and L. E. Burke
Daytime Sleepiness and Functional Outcomes in Older Adults With Diabetes
The Diabetes Educator, May 1, 2009; 35(3): 455 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
V Dauphinot, H Wolff, F Naudin, R Gueguen, C Sermet, J-M Gaspoz, and M P Kossovsky
New obesity body mass index threshold for self-reported data
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2009; 63(2): 128 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Min Park, M. Kyung Lim, K. Won Jung, S. Ae Shin, K.-Y. Yoo, Y. Ho Yun, and B. Yul Huh
Prediagnosis Smoking, Obesity, Insulin Resistance, and Second Primary Cancer Risk in Male Cancer Survivors: National Health Insurance Corporation Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2007; 25(30): 4835 - 4843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
G. Davey Smith, C. Steer, S. Leary, and A. Ness
Is there an intrauterine influence on obesity? Evidence from parent child associations in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)
Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 876 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. B Pierce and D. A Leon
Age at menarche and adult BMI in the Aberdeen Children of the 1950s Cohort Study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2005; 82(4): 733 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. W. Oh, Y. S. Yoon, and S.-A. Shin
Effects of Excess Weight on Cancer Incidences Depending on Cancer Sites and Histologic Findings Among Men: Korea National Health Insurance Corporation Study
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4742 - 4754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
O. Basso, A. J Wilcox, C. R Weinberg, D. D Baird, and J. Olsen
Height and risk of severe pre-eclampsia. A study within the Danish National Birth Cohort
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2004; 33(4): 858 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. Li, S. Jewell, and L. Grummer-Strawn
Maternal obesity and breast-feeding practices
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2003; 77(4): 931 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
C. Bolton-Smith, M. Woodward, H. Tunstall-Pedoe, and C. Morrison
Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2000; 54(2): 143 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.