Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McColl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roderick, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McColl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roderick, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Improving health outcomes - a review of case studies from English health authorities


Alastair McColl, Lecturer in Public Health Medicine
John Gabbay, Director and Professor of Public Health Medicine
Paul Roderick, Senior Lecturer in Public Health Medicine

Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, Level B, Southampton General Hospital Southampton SO 16 6YD


Address correspondence to Dr A. McColl

We review a series of case studies from English health authorities that have tackled the assessment and improvement of health outcomes. We reflect their concerns and difficulties and the lessons they learnt. We identified case studies from a telephone survey of 91 representatives of the 100 English health authorities (61 were directors of public health). We edited 26 structured case studies which described how they had used population health outcome assessments or indicators. The health outcome assessments included service reviews, needs assessment projects, case-control studies, small area variations analyses, action research, and the use of focus groups. Many case studies highlighted inequalities in health service delivery. Health authorities chose some topics because they were outliers on national indicators, others had found unacceptable inequalities within their district, and others had been concerned that clinicians were not using the most effective interventions. Public health departments played a major role in these population-based health outcome assessments. The case studies highlighted the strengths and weakness of national population-based health outcome indicators, the difficulties of using information on effectiveness, the role of evidence based process proxies for outcome, the need to extend information sources, the involvement of patients and carers, and the difficulty of changing clinical behaviour. We make recommendations as to how the Department of Health and NHS Executive could help health authorities improve the health outcomes of the populations they serve.

Keywords: health outcome indicators, health outcome assessment, health authorities - case studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.