Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kisely, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kisely, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

More alike than different

Comparing the mental health needs of London and other inner city areas


Steve Kisely
, Consultant

Department of Public Health, Birmingham Health Authority Vernon Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B16 5RQ

BACKGROUND: In the absence of epidemiological data, mental health services planners often rely on routinely available sources to estimate needs including comparative and deprivation weighted approaches.

METHODS: This paper reviews available methods using the King's Fund review of mental health services in London as an example. Alternative sources of data to those chosen by the King's Fund report are also reviewed.

RESULTS: Results can vary depending on the comparative populations and methods used. The King's Fund report concluded that London's needs were uniquely high in relation to the rest of the country including other inner city areas, but the use of differing comparison populations in different areas of the document made it difficult to assess whether levels of need were actually higher. Often, London was compared with the national average rather than with inner cities elsewhere in the United Kingdom. There were also shortcomings in the report's assumptions underlying the estimation of services required for London. Alternative sources of data suggest that the needs of cities such as Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds and Newcastle are at least as great as those of London.

CONCLUSIONS: This paper illustrates how the use of different techniques on routinely available data can lead to differing conclusions, and offers guidelines to help analyse reports that rely on such methods. Rather than discussing the relative merits of different inner city areas, issues of equity should be addressed by the use of an agreed set of data to ensure that like is compared with like.

Keywords: health needs assessment, mental health services, service planning


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
M. Commander and L. Disanyake
Impact of functionalised community mental health teams on in-patient care
Psychiatr. Bull., June 1, 2006; 30(6): 213 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. BINDMAN, G. GLOVER, D. GOLDBERG, and D. CHISHOLM
Expenditure on mental health care by English health authorities: a potential cause of inequity
The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2000; 177(3): 267 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.