Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, D. M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, D. M. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Errors in postcode to enumeration district mapping and their effect on small area analyses of health data


S. E. Collins
, Research Fellow, Sheffield Centre for Geographical Information and Spatial Analysis
R. P. Haining
, Professor, Department of Geography
I. R. Bowns
, Senior Research Fellow, School of Health and Related Research
D. J. Crofts
, Research Health Visitor
T. S. Williams
, Research Associate
A. S. Rigby
, Senior Lecturer
D. M. B. Hall
, Professor

The University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN
Department of Paediatrics, Sheffield Children's Hospital, The University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN


Address correspondence to Professor R. P. Haining

BACKGROUND: Health research often seeks to associate individuals to their socio-economic circumstances by linking an individual's postcode to their Census enumeration district (ED). As part of a study into health visitor resource allocation the objective here is to quantify the errors that arise in attaching ED level deprivation scores to records and counts of records by ED when records are matched to EDs via their postcodes rather than their exact address.

METHODS: The result of routine matching of postcodes to EDs was compared with the more accurate method of matching addresses to EDs. Townsend scores were then attributed to records according to the two different methods and the results compared. A sample of 4013 births registered in Sheffield in 1996 was used.

RESULT: The comparative work showed that the mismatching of individual addresses arising from matching postcodes to EDs was 16.4 per cent. (The 95 per cent confidence interval is 15.1–17.7 per cent.) Over one-third of mismatched records (about 6 per cent of the total records) were found to have Townsend scores greater than ±2 compared with the score obtained through the more accurate process of address matching.

CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of the study is that it is important to recognize there are errors inherent in matching individual addresses to EDs via the address postcode. For problems involving resource allocation and for research into relationships between health outcomes or service uptake and deprivation it may be necessary to seek to quantify the level of error introduced through using postcode to ED matching.

Keywords: postcodes, enumeration districts, deprivation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
R Parslow, N A El-Shimy, D B Cundall, and P A McKinney
Tuberculosis, deprivation, and ethnicity in Leeds, UK, 1982-1997
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2001; 84(2): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
E. C Goyder, J. L Botha, and P. G McNally
Inequalities in access to diabetes care: evidence from a historical cohort study
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2000; 9(2): 85 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.