Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stone, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stone, D. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

The clinical epidemiology ward round: can we teach public health medicine at the bedside?


David H. Stone, Director, Paediatric Epidemiology and Community Health (PEACH) Unit

PEACH Unit, Department of Child Health, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow G3 8SJ

BACKGROUND: The clinical epidemiology ward round (CEWR) is an educational tool for integrating the teaching of epidemiology with clinical paediatrics. It aims to facilitate the acquisition of the knowledge, skills and attitudes that promote the effective application of epidemiological insights into routine clinical practice. This paper describes experience of the CEWR in a UK medical school and initial student responses to it.

METHODS: Since 1995, the CEWR has formed an integral part of the clinical teaching given to all final phase medical students during their eight-week child health course at the University of Glasgow. It took place in a general paediatric ward of the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow. Groups of up to seven students were taught by a clinical epidemiologist with a strong research interest, as well as clinical experience, in child health. Each round lasted approximately 90 minutes and the teaching style was informal and interactive. At the end of the child health course, students were asked a series of questions relating to the CEWR's educational objectives.

RESULTS: The evaluation indicated that the CEWR had been well received by students, 85 per cent of whom said it was an excellent or good idea in principle, and 71 per cent of whom said it worked well in practice. Most students seemed unconvinced about its role in reinforcing epidemiological knowledge or in clinical skill development.

CONCLUSION: The CEWR requires further development but offers a potentially inexpensive, effective and enjoyable vehicle for integrating the teaching of two previously separate components of the curriculum.

Keywords: education, epidemiology, evidence-based medicine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M BLAIR
Public health: Taking a population perspective on child health
Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2000; 83(1): 7 - 9.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
D. Stone
Educating tomorrow's doctors in injury prevention
Inj. Prev., June 1, 1999; 5(2): 157 - 157.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.