Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lindmark, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lindmark, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

The impact of obstetric risk factors and socioeconomic characteristics on utilization of antenatal care


Anna Berglund, Consultant
Gunilla Lindmark, Consultant

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Central Hospital SE-721 89 Västerås, Sweden
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akademiska Hospital SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden


Address correspondence to Dr Anna Berglund.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study is to assess the impact of obstetric risk status and defined risk factors on utilization of antenatal care in a Swedish county.

METHODS: An area-based, population study was carried out with retrospective review of standardized patient records before (n=2008) and after (n=1874) the introduction of a reduced schedule for surveillance of pregnancy. For assessment of individual risk factors a multiple regression model is used.

RESULTS: Overall the number of contacts per pregnancy decreased from 13.2 to 11.4. With the reduced routine programme the difference between low-risk and high-risk women increased from 1.1 to 2.7 visits on average. In the multiple regression model socioeconomic characteristics had little influence on the use of antenatal care. Previous obstetric complications increased compliance to the schedule after the programme change. Complications during current pregnancy were important for the number of extra visits planned by the staff. Self referrals were most influenced by symptoms but in-patient care was influenced by multiple factors. The total explanatory ability of the regression model was low for time of first visit to the antenatal care unit and referrals for ultrasound examinations.

CONCLUSION: With a reduced routine programme the surveillance became better apportioned to obstetric risk. Even a combination of medical or obstetric risk factors with socioeconomic characteristics explain only part of the variation in utilization of antenatal care.

Keywords: antenatal care, risk factors, utilization of care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.