Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thiru, K
Right arrow Articles by Majeed, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thiru, K
Right arrow Articles by Majeed, A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health Medicine 21:179-184 (1999)
© 1999 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

Management of ischaemic heart disease in primary care: towards better practice


K Thiru0,z
J Gray1
A Majeed0

0 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK
1 Lavender Hill Group Practice, 19 Pountney Road, London SW11 5TU, UK
z Corresponding author

Background Ischaemic heart disease is the commonest cause of mortality in the United Kingdom. The objective of this study was to assess the management of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care, focusing particularly on the management of hypercholesterolaemia.

Methods A cross-sectional survey was carried out of the clinical records of patients aged 25-74 years with confirmed ischaemic heart disease in six general practices (total list size 56 600).

Results Recording of risk factors varied from 97 per cent for blood pressure to 73 per cent for cholesterol measurement. Seventy-two per cent of the patients had adequate blood pressure control, based on their last recorded blood pressure. Sixty-one per cent (267) were known to be taking aspirin daily and 29 per cent (125) had undergone revascularization treatment. Sixty-eight per cent (296) of the patients had pre-treatment cholesterol levels of 5.5 mmol/l or greater and 34 per cent (147) were currently taking lipid lowering drugs. Statins were the most commonly used cholesterol lowering agents and were being taken by 30 per cent (131) of the patients. Patients who had undergone revascularization treatment had levels of recording of risk factors similar to other patients with ischaemic heart disease but were more likely to be taking daily aspirin (71 per cent versus 57 per cent, relative risk 1.24, 95 per cent confidence intervals (CI) 1.07-1.44). The mean pre-treatment cholesterol was 6.49 mmol/l and the mean post-treatment cholesterol 5.80 mmol/l (difference 0.69 mmol/l, 95 per cent CI 0.55-0.84 mmol/l).

Conclusions Systematic searches of computerized and paper medical records can identify subgroups of patients who will benefit from continuing follow-up in primary care. The results of this study suggest that ischaemic heart disease remains an area where there is scope to improve the management of patients in primary care. Considerable effort will be required from the members of the primary health care team to achieve this objective, particularly in the areas of computerized data collection and in the identification and recall of patients.

Keywords: primary care, ischaemic heart disease, cholesterol, statins, clinical data recording


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries. Principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2001; 22(7): 554 - 572.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.