Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garvican, L
Right arrow Articles by Littlejohn, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garvican, L
Right arrow Articles by Littlejohn, P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health Medicine 21:447-452 (1999)
© 1999 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

Public health physicians who contribute to on-call communicable disease control duties: national comparative clinical audit by questionnaire survey


L Garvican0,z
R Mayon-White1
P Littlejohn0

0 Health Care Evaluation Unit, Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK
1 Oxfordshire Health Authority, Richards Building, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LG, UK
z Corresponding author

Background.In most health authorities in the UK, general public healthy physicians provide out-of-hours cover for specialists in communicable disease control. Although communicable disease control was part of their specialist training, there is no current formal mechanism to enable these doctors to keep up to date. The Faculty of Public Health Medicine has an active Continuing Professional Development Programme. A new initiative aimed to assess the knowledge of general public health physicians who take part of in on-call communicable disease control rotas, or may do so in the future, by means of an educational clinical audit exercise.

Method.Experts in communicable disease control developed a questionnaire containing a selection of scenarios, covering six different situations that might arise on-call. This was circulated to all members of the Faculty, but participation was voluntary. Answers were marked against model answers agreed by the experts. Results were analysed by positions held by participants.

Results.Response was unacceptably low. Overall scores ranged from 15 per cent to 89 per cent with a mean of 63 per cent. There was a trend of improvement in marks from those not normally involved in on-call (mean score 56.1 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval 51.6-60.7 per cent)) through Directors of Public Health (58.4 (54.9-62.0) per cent), Consultants (62.8 (60-65.6) per cent), and specialist registrars (67.9 (65.2-70.6) per cent), to Consultants in Communicable Disease Control (70.9 (68.1-73.6) per cent).

Conclusion.The public health physicians who took part in this audit appear to be competent in their knowledge of communicable disease control, and particularly good at dealing with meningitis and salmonella, which are frequently encountered out of hours.

Keywords: communicable disease control, clinical audit, on-call duties, professional competence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A M Hartley, R K Griffiths, and K L Saunders
An evaluation of clinical governance in the public health departments of the West Midlands Region
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, August 1, 2002; 56(8): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.