Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Right arrow Articles by Azene, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Right arrow Articles by Azene, G
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health Medicine 22:99-107 (2000)
© 2000 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

Escherichia coli O157:H7; an economic assessment of an outbreak


JA Roberts0,z
PA Upton1
G Azene2

0 Health Services Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
1 Lothian Health Board, Deaconess House, 148 The Pleasance, Edinburgh EH8 9RS, UK
2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
z Corresponding author

Background.The aim of the study was to assess the impact of an outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 that occurred in 1994 in a rural community, with a population of approximately 107 000, to the west of Edinburgh.

Methods.The impact of the outbreak was assessed during the acute phase of the illness and in the subsequent 12 months. The method involved three surveys of confirmed cases using general practice notes, hospital records and interviews with cases. Key persons involved in the investigation and control of the outbreak were also interviewed. The impact of the illness on cases and their families was estimated and the resources used to treat cases and to control the outbreak were costed and long-term costs projected.

Results.There were 71 cases whose ages ranged from 7 months to 84 years. The mortality rate was 1.4 per hundred cases. There were 10 cases of haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) and one case of thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpurpa (TTP). Two children were on long-term dialysis. Co-morbidity involving the immune system was associated with hospital admission. The illness lasted on average 6.9 weeks. Twenty-six per cent of cases reported symptoms 12 months later. The average cost per HUS case was £62 353, the TTP case cost £21 422, non-HUS and non-TTP cases cost £1030. The costs of investigated and controlling the outbreak were £171 848. The costs of cases projected over 30 years were £11.9 million, or £168 032 per case.

Conclusions.The impact on the health of cases was considerable and the costs were high. Every effort should be made to prevent the disease and to identify and control outbreaks quickly.

Keywords: E. coli O157, economic evaluation, milk-borne outbreak, HUS


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Khanna, L. Waechter, J. Sargeant, W. F. Clark, and A. X. Garg
Environmental prevention of human disease from verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1819 - 1822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. D. Schleinitz and P. A. Heidenreich
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Combination Antiplatelet Therapy for High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes: Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone
Ann Intern Med, February 15, 2005; 142(4): 251 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.