Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawlor, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hanratty, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawlor, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hanratty, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health Medicine 23:219-226 (2001)
© 2001 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

The effect of physical activity advice given in routine primary care consultations: a systematic review


D. A. Lawlor1
B. Hanratty2

1 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR
2 Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB

Background Recent evidence and recommendations suggest that physical activity health promotion should be aimed at persuading the whole population to adopt an active lifestyle. Intensive medical programmes aimed at promoting physical activity amongst those at risk are not effective at achieving this aim. Brief advice from primary care professionals to quit smoking has a small but, at a population level, important effect. Brief advice in primary care to adopt a more active lifestyle may be similarly effective. The aim of this review is to determine the effect of advice given in routine primary care consultations on levels of physical activity.

Methods A systematic review was carried out of trials assessing the effectiveness of advice given in routine primary care consultations. Data sources were four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Sport discus, Cochrane Library), and bibliographies of retrieved papers were searched. Experts were contacted.

Results Eight trials, with a total of 4747 participants, were identified; the majority were from the United States. Outcome measures varied considerably between trials, including continuous measures (e.g. duration of exercise) and dichotomous measures (e.g. being active), therefore statistical pooling was inappropriate. Two of the trials were cluster randomized controlled trials, the remainder were quasi-experimental. None of the trials fulfilled all of the predetermined quality criteria and selection bias in the non-randomized studies may have exaggerated results. Four of the six trials that presented short-term (up to 8 weeks) results found advice to be effective; only one of the four trials with long-term follow-up (4–12 months) found a sustained effect. The two randomized controlled trials had negative short- and long-term results.

Conclusions From the available evidence it appears that advice in routine primary care consultations is not an effective means of producing sustained increases in physical activity. However, these results may not be applicable to the United Kingdom, where the structure of primary care is unique. Quality research in UK primary care would be valuable.

Keywords: physical activity, health promotion, brief intervention, primary care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
G. Boysen, L.-H. Krarup, X. Zeng, A. Oskedra, J. Korv, G. Andersen, C. Gluud, A. Pedersen, M. Lindahl, L. Hansen, et al.
ExStroke Pilot Trial of the effect of repeated instructions to improve physical activity after ischaemic stroke: a multinational randomised controlled clinical trial
BMJ, July 22, 2009; 339(jul20_3): b2810 - b2810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
N H Williams
"The wise, for cure, on exercise depend": physical activity interventions in primary care in Wales
Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2009; 43(2): 106 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
C. Hudon, M. Fortin, and H. Soubhi
Single risk factor interventions to promote physical activity among patients with chronic diseases: Systematic review
Can Fam Physician, August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1130 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. H. Marcus, D. M. Williams, P. M. Dubbert, J. F. Sallis, A. C. King, A. K. Yancey, B. A. Franklin, D. Buchner, S. R. Daniels, and R. P. Claytor
Physical Activity Intervention Studies: What We Know and What We Need to Know: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity); Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research
Circulation, December 12, 2006; 114(24): 2739 - 2752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
A. P. Ribera, J. McKenna, and C. Riddoch
Physical activity promotion in general practices of Barcelona: a case study
Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2006; 21(4): 538 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
E. H. Morrato, J. O. Hill, H. R. Wyatt, V. Ghushchyan, and P. W. Sullivan
Are health care professionals advising patients with diabetes or at risk for developing diabetes to exercise more?
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2006; 29(3): 543 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
R. A. Harrison, F. McNair, and L. Dugdill
Access to exercise referral schemes - a population based analysis
J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2005; 27(4): 326 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. Demark-Wahnefried, N. M. Aziz, J. H. Rowland, and B. M. Pinto
Riding the Crest of the Teachable Moment: Promoting Long-Term Health After the Diagnosis of Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5814 - 5830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. Thurston and K. Green
Adherence to exercise in later life: how can exercise on prescription programmes be made more effective?
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2004; 19(3): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
N. W. Burton, G. Turrell, and B. Oldenburg
Participation in Recreational Physical Activity: Why Do Socioeconomic Groups Differ?
Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2003; 30(2): 225 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
D A Lawlor, A R Ness, A M Cope, A Davis, P Insall, and C Riddoch
The challenges of evaluating environmental interventions to increase population levels of physical activity: the case of the UK National Cycle Network
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2003; 57(2): 96 - 101.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Shaw
The accidental epidemiologist: losing the way or following social-epidemiological leads?
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2002; 31(3): 523 - 526.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
M. V. Chakravarthy, M. J. Joyner, and F. W. Booth
An Obligation for Primary Care Physicians to Prescribe Physical Activity to Sedentary Patients to Reduce the Risk of Chronic Health Conditions
Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2002; 77(2): 165 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.