Journal of Public Health Medicine 23:227-234 (2001)
© 2001 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom
Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials
Christine J. McPherson1
Irene J. Higginson1
Julie Hearn1
1 Department of Palliative Care and Policy, GKT School of Medicine and St Christopher's Hospice, Bessemer Road, London SE5 9RJ
There is increasing evidence to suggest that patients with cancer require more information about their disease and its consequences than they receive. In an attempt to address these needs, a variety of methods have been used to facilitate the passage of information from health professionals and other cancer information sources to cancer patients and their families. These include written material, telephone help-lines, teaching and audiovisual aids. Although these efforts have been well received, little attention has been given to the effectiveness of the methods employed. The aims of this paper were to systematically review randomized controlled trials that have evaluated methods of information-giving to cancer patients and their families. Relevant literature was identified through computerized databases, Internet cancer sites and bibliography searches. Multiple reviewers independently analysed the methodological quality of the papers according to agreed criteria. From this process, 10 studies were identified. Interventions ranged from written information to audiotapes, audiovisual aids and interactive medium. Individually tailored methods such as patient care records and patient educational programmes were also reviewed. The evidence indicated that the interventions had positive effects on a number of patient outcomes, such as knowledge and recall, symptom management, satisfaction, preferences, health care utilization and affective states. This was above and beyond the usual care provision. In the majority of studies the interventions had no effect on psychological indices. Furthermore, the review highlighted that certain methods should be based on individual preferences for information rather than uniformly administered.
Keywords: communication, cancer, methods of information giving, randomized controlled trials
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Selman, I. J Higginson, G. Agupio, N. Dinat, J. Downing, L. Gwyther, T. Mashao, K. Mmoledi, A. P Moll, L. M. Sebuyira, et al. Meeting information needs of patients with incurable progressive disease and their families in South Africa and Uganda: multicentre qualitative study BMJ, April 22, 2009; 338(apr22_1): b1326 - b1326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O Groene, M J M H Lombarts, N Klazinga, J Alonso, A Thompson, and R Sunol Is patient-centredness in European hospitals related to existing quality improvement strategies? Analysis of a cross-sectional survey (MARQuIS study) Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2009; 18(Suppl_1): i44 - i50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Maguire, J. Cowie, C. Leadbetter, K. McCall, K. Swingler, L. McCann, and N. Kearney The development of a side effect risk assessment tool (ASyMS(C)-SERAT) for use in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy Journal of Research in Nursing, January 1, 2009; 14(1): 27 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J N Hoes, J W G Jacobs, M Boers, D Boumpas, F Buttgereit, N Caeyers, E H Choy, M Cutolo, J A P Da Silva, G Esselens, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations on the management of systemic glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2007; 66(12): 1560 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Bruera, J L. Palmer, E. Pace, K. Zhang, J. Willey, F. Strasser, and M. I Bennett A randomized, controlled trial of physician postures when breaking bad news to cancer patients Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2007; 21(6): 501 - 505. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Coulter and J. Ellins Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients BMJ, July 7, 2007; 335(7609): 24 - 27. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Stebbing, I. C K Wong, R. Kaushal, and A. Jaffe The role of communication in paediatric drug safety Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 440 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F E M Murtagh and A Thorns Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making. J. Med. Ethics, June 1, 2006; 32(6): 311 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Iconomou, A. Viha, A. Koutras, I. Koukourikou, V. Mega, T. Makatsoris, A. Onyenadum, K. Assimakopoulos, A. G. Vagenakis, and H. P. Kalofonos Impact of providing booklets about chemotherapy to newly presenting patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial Ann. Onc., March 1, 2006; 17(3): 515 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Yates, S. Aranda, M. Hargraves, B. Mirolo, A. Clavarino, S. McLachlan, and H. Skerman Randomized Controlled Trial of an Educational Intervention for Managing Fatigue in Women Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2005; 23(25): 6027 - 6036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. I Stajduhar and B. Davies Variations in and factors influencing family members' decisions for palliative home care Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 21 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|