Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majeed, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bindman, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Majeed, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bindman, A. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health Medicine 24:21-26 (2002)
© 2002 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

Variation in coronary artery bypass grafting, angioplasty, cataract surgery, and hip replacement rates among primary care groups in London: association with population and practice characteristics


Azeem Majeed
Joseph Eliahoo
Martin Bardsley
David Morgan
Andrew B. Bindman

School of Public Policy, University College London, London WC1H 9EZ. azeem.majeed{at}ons.gov.uk
Research and Development Directorate, UCLH NHS Trust, London NW1 2LT
Health of Londoners Project, East London & City Health Authority, London E1 1RD
Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA

Background Operation rates for common surgical procedures are known to vary widely both between areas within the same country and between countries. However, no studies in the United Kingdom have yet examined the variation in the use of important groups of surgical procedures among primary care groups.

Methods Data were obtained from the NHS Executive and the Department of Health on each of the 66 primary care groups in London that existed on 1 April 1999. These were used to estimate indicators for six main groups of variables: population estimates, mortality rates, Census data, benefits data, practice characteristics, and hospital admissions. The data were used to generate a number of population and practice variables describing the characteristics of each primary care group in London. We also obtained information at ward level by age and sex on the number of patients admitted for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and angioplasty (PTCA); cataract surgery; and hip replacement in patients aged 65 years and over during the period 1997–1998. These data were used with population estimates to estimate directly age-standardized annual operation rates for each primary care group for the study period.

Results Operation rates for the three groups of procedures examined in this study varied widely between the 66 primary care groups. The directly standardized combined CABG and PTCA rate varied from 28 to 193 per 100 000 (mean 80); cataract surgery rates from 167 to 618 per 100 000 (mean 291); and hip replacement in people aged 65 years and over from 74 to 363 per 100 000 (mean 202). Correlations between operation rates and population and practice variables were relatively weak. Multifactorial models explained 57 per cent of the variation in CABG and PTCA rates, 34 per cent of the variation in cataract surgery rates, and 27 per cent of the variation in hip replacement rates.

Conclusions There are wide variations in the operation rates for important groups of surgical procedures among primary care groups. These variations are poorly explained by differences in the population and practice characteristics of primary care groups. The underlying reasons for variations in operation rates need to be better understood if the ambitious targets for access to elective surgery outlined in the NHS plan are to be met.

Keywords: operation rates, variation, primary care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
A. Judge, N. J. Welton, J. Sandhu, and Y. Ben-Shlomo
Geographical variation in the provision of elective primary hip and knee replacement: the role of socio-demographic, hospital and distance variables
J. Public Health Med., September 1, 2009; 31(3): 413 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
K E Dreinhofer, P Dieppe, T Sturmer, D Grober-Gratz, M Floren, K-P Gunther, W Puhl, and H Brenner
Indications for total hip replacement: comparison of assessments of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2006; 65(10): 1346 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
M. Strong, R. Maheswaran, and J. Radford
Socioeconomic deprivation, coronary heart disease prevalence and quality of care: a practice-level analysis in Rotherham using data from the new UK general practitioner Quality and Outcomes Framework
J. Public Health Med., March 1, 2006; 28(1): 39 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
P R Ward, P R Noyce, and A S St Leger
Are GP practice prescribing rates for coronary heart disease drugs equitable? A cross sectional analysis in four primary care trusts in England
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2004; 58(2): 89 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.