Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vedsted, P.
Right arrow Articles by Olesen, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vedsted, P.
Right arrow Articles by Olesen, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health Medicine 24:53-57 (2002)
© 2002 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

Special status consultation for frequent attenders. Who are the candidates?


Peter Vedsted
Morten Bondo Christensen
Henrik Toft Sørensen
Per Fink
Frede Olesen

The Research Unit and Department of General Practice, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. pv{at}alm.au.dk
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aalborg and Aarhus Hospitals, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
The Research Unit for Functional Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Background The need to optimize frequent attender (FA) care and to economize on scarce resources in primary care has given rise to calls for intervention. However, precise knowledge of the specifics of this need is scarce, as is knowledge of how best to orchestrate intervention vis-à-vis particular FA groups. The aim of the study was to analyse the need for a special FA status consultation and to analyse if such need springs from physical, mental or social factors among FAs.

Method Half of the 270 general practices in the County of Aarhus, Denmark, were randomly allocated to the study group (in total 132 practices; 220 general practitioners (GPs)). From these practices age- and gender-stratified samples of FAs were drawn. FAs were defined as the top 10 per cent attenders in 12 months. Questionnaires were used to elicit FA and GP attitudes to the introduction of a status consultation and to obtain GPs' evaluation of their FAs' physical, mental and social status. The special FA consultation was introduced as a reimbursed half-hour consultation where the FA and the GP could discuss the patient's current and future care status.

Results Over three-quarters of the FAs would accept the offer to have the status consultation, and the GPs would recommend it for one-fourth of their FAs. The expressed need was highly associated with an expected positive effect on health (prevalence ratio (PR) for GPs: 11.7 (8.9–15.5), PR for FAs: 1.6 (1.5–1.8)) and a decrease in attendance (PR for FAs: 1.4 (1.3–1.5)). The GPs quoted physical, mental and social indications for the consultation. The FAs who had high levels of functional symptoms were most likely to accept the consultation.

Conclusions There was an expressed need for an FA status consultation, which may lead to a positive effect on health and attendance. The GPs pointed to physical, mental and social indicators for a special FA consultation.

Keywords: adult, cross-sectional studies, Denmark, family practice, frequent attenders, health services research


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
U T Kadam, K Jordan, and P R Croft
Clinical comorbidity in patients with osteoarthritis: a case-control study of general practice consulters in England and Wales
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2004; 63(4): 408 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.