Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harpham, T.
Right arrow Articles by Few, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harpham, T.
Right arrow Articles by Few, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health Medicine 24:112-119 (2002)
© 2002 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

The Dar Es Salaam Urban Health Project, Tanzania: a multi-dimensional evaluation


Trudy Harpham
Roger Few

South Bank University, Wandsworth Road, London SW8 2JZ


Address correspondence to Trudy Harpham. E-mail: t.harpham{at}sbu.ac.uk

Background In the 1990s, as a response to rapid urbanization, there were a number of large, urban health initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa. Most tended to be comprehensive as opposed to selective in scope: they aimed at strengthening the health system as a whole, and placed emphasis on delivering improved services at the primary level, with increased community participation. A multi-dimensional approach is required to assess the achievements of such initiatives.

Methods In 2000 an external evaluation of the Swiss-funded Dar es Salaam Urban Health Project, Tanzania, used 50 key informant interviews, 90 health facility exit interviews, 90 community resident interviews and document analysis to assess achievements over a 10 year period. The study considered achievements in terms of capacity building, improving quality of care, community involvement, inter-sectoral action and sustainability.

Results Although the project achieved improvements in capacity building and in structural and technical quality of care, there were difficulties in generating inter-sectoral action and the concept of participation was limited. However, citylevel ‘ownership’ of the activities was high, and, with the advent of sector-wide allocation of funds (SWAPs) in the health sector in Tanzania, the prospects for sustainability of the achievements made in the project appear to be good.

Conclusion Both the multi-dimensional method of the evaluation and the findings can inform future urban health initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa and in other resourceconstrained environments. The decentralization that occurred in Dar es Salaam and the general approach of the project provided a platform to test out various elements that are common to health sector reform across developing countries.

Keywords: urban health, health systems, evaluation, Tanzania


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.