Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Whincup, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Whincup, P. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health Medicine 24:285-291 (2002)
© 2002 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

Non-attendance at re-examination 20 years after screening in the British Regional Heart Study


M. C. Thomas
M. Walker
L. T. Lennon
A. G. Thomson
F. C. Lampe
A. G. Shaper
P. H. Whincup

Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF. mary.thomas{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Department of Public Health Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE.

Background Maintenance of high participation rates in longitudinal studies is critical to their validity because of the possibility of bias associated with non-participation, which may differ between studies. This paper examines factors associated with participation status over time, by comparing the characteristics of non-attenders and attenders at a 20 year follow-up examination in a cardiovascular cohort study with an initial participation rate of 78 per cent.

Methods A baseline examination was carried out between 1978 and 1980 and subjects have been followed up through regular reviews of general practice records, postal questionnaires, and a clinical re-examination of survivors in 1998–2000. Data obtained by questionnaire in 1996 (Q96) and at baseline examination have been used to compare the characteristics of these recent non-attenders and attenders who remain in the cohort for further follow-up.

Results The non-attendance rate of available survivors at re-examination was 23 per cent (n = 1313). Rates of non-attendance were highest in Scotland and lowest in Southern England. Non-attenders were older than attenders, more likely to smoke, and reported more disabling conditions and greater use of multiple medications at Q96, but recalled similar rates of diagnosed coronary heart disease. Marked differences in social factors were identified. Total mortality rates within 1 year of re-examination were over three times higher amongst non-attenders than attenders.

Conclusions Non-attendance is related to health status, risk factor status and social circumstances and may affect some estimates of disease prevalence, but does not appear to have a major impact on the estimated prevalence of coronary heart disease. Information collected on non-attenders in longitudinal studies helps to estimate, adjust and minimize these effects.

Keywords: non-attendance, follow-up, bias, methodology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
G D Batty and C R Gale
Impact of resurvey non-response on the associations between baseline risk factors and cardiovascular disease mortality: prospective cohort study
J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2009; 63(11): 952 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. L. Hardoon, P. H. Whincup, L. T. Lennon, S. G. Wannamethee, S. Capewell, and R. W. Morris
How Much of the Recent Decline in the Incidence of Myocardial Infarction in British Men Can Be Explained by Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Factors?: Evidence From a Prospective Population-Based Study
Circulation, February 5, 2008; 117(5): 598 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S G. Wannamethee, G. D. Lowe, A. Rumley, K R. Bruckdorfer, and P. H Whincup
Associations of vitamin C status, fruit and vegetable intakes, and markers of inflammation and hemostasis
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2006; 83(3): 567 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S G. Wannamethee, A G. Shaper, and P. H Whincup
Body fat distribution, body composition, and respiratory function in elderly men
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2005; 82(5): 996 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S G. Wannamethee, A G. Shaper, R. W Morris, and P. H Whincup
Measures of adiposity in the identification of metabolic abnormalities in elderly men
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2005; 81(6): 1313 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
S G. Wannamethee, A G. Shaper, and M. Walker
Overweight and obesity and weight change in middle aged men: impact on cardiovascular disease and diabetes
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2005; 59(2): 134 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Walker, P. Whincup, and A. Shaper
The British Regional Heart Study 1975-2004
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2004; 33(6): 1185 - 1192.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.