Skip Navigation

Journal of Public Health 2004 26(3):293-296; doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdh128
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pickles, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webb, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pickles, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health 26(3) © Faculty of Public Health 2004; all rights reserved.

Uptake for cervical screening by ethnicity and place-of-birth: a population-based cross-sectional study



R. Webb1

J. Richardson2

A. Esmail3

A. Pickles1
1 School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, 1st Floor, Stopford Building, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
2 South Manchester Primary Care Trust, 1st Floor, Home Four, Withington Hospital, Nell Lane, West Didsbury, Manchester M20 2LR, UK.
3 School of Primary Care, University of Manchester, Rusholme Health Centre, Walmer Street, Manchester M14 5NP, UK.


Address correspondence to Roger Webb, at Centre for Women’s Mental Health Research, University of Manchester, 7th Floor, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: roger.webb{at}man.ac.uk

Previous research indicates low screening uptake among South Asian women. We aimed to generate contemporary evidence of uptake by ethnicity using the screening records of eligible women resident in Manchester (n = 72613). Uptake among South Asians was lower than among other women, a difference explained by area- and practice-level confounding. A higher proportion of South Asians were recorded as ‘never screened’, an effect only partially explained by confounding. In practices with relatively large South Asian populations, uptake was higher among South Asians. Women born in a diverse range of overseas countries had uptake rates below 60 per cent and approximately a third of women born overseas were recorded as ‘never screened’. If comprehensive coverage is to be achieved in inner city areas attention should now focus on the needs of a diverse range of ethnic minority groups other than South Asians. The routine collection of ethnicity data in primary care is also indicated.

Keywords: cervical screening, ethnicity, needs assessment, primary care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.