Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on March 4, 2005
Journal of Public Health 2005 27(2):205-211; doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Who has time to sleep?
Lauren Hale, PhD
RAND Corporation
Address correspondence to Lauren Hale, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407, USA. E-mail: lhale{at}rand.org
Background Both marriage and education appear to confer a protective effect on health. Few studies have examined the extent to which both undersleeping and oversleeping explain these relationships. I examined whether marital status, educational background, and other sociodemographic variables are associated with higher-risk sleep durations.
Methods Over 7000 individuals aged 25–64 collected time-use diary data during a 24-h period. For both weekdays and weekend days, separate multinomial logistic regression models were estimated using three categories of sleep duration as the outcome category.
Results Unmarried individuals are significantly more likely to sleep a short amount on both weekdays and weekends compared to married people. Single people also are significantly more likely to sleep a long amount. People with less than a college education are significantly more likely to sleep both a short amount and a long amount on weekdays relative to the college educated.
Conclusions High-risk sleep durations (short sleeping and long sleeping) are positively associated with sociodemographic categories associated with poorer health. More research should investigate whether social inequalities in health can be explained in part by variation in sleep duration.
Keywords: sleep duration, marital status, education, time-use studies
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Steptoe, V. Peacey, and J. Wardle Sleep duration and health in young adults. Arch Intern Med, September 18, 2006; 166(16): 1689 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|