Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on October 5, 2005
Journal of Public Health 2005 27(4):326-330; doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi048
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Access to exercise referral schemes – a population based analysis
R. A. Harrison
R. A. Harrison, Senior Research Fellow (Honorary), Evidence for Population Health Unit, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT; Senior Research Fellow (Honorary), Bolton Primary Care Trust, St Peter’s House, Bolton BLI 1PP
F. McNair
L. Dugdill
F. McNair, PhD Student, L. Dugdill, Reader in Exercise and Health, School of Community, Health Sciences and Social Care, Salford University, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT
Address correspondence to Dr Roger A Harrison. E-mail: roger.harrison{at}manchester.ac.uk
Background Sedentary behaviour is a public health priority in many countries. Hundreds of community-based exercise referral schemes have been established in Europe and USA, to increase physical activity. Experimental evidence questions the effectiveness of these schemes. No previous evaluations have considered a population approach nor provide detailed information on the types of people accessing these schemes. This is of concern given increasing health inequalities in other areas of care. Our register-based study quantified the numbers and characteristics of patients referred and accessing a district-wide exercise referral scheme. The analysis considers the effectiveness of these schemes to a geographically defined population.
Methods Data were collected prospectively from a patient register for referrals made to a district-wide exercise referral scheme in north-west England. Analysis examined referral rates and the influence of practitioner and patient characteristics on access to the scheme.
Results Over 5 years, 6610 adults were referred from 125 general practices, with 60.8 per cent female and a mean age of 51.3 years (SD 12.6). This represents 4 per cent of the adult sedentary population in that district. The most common reason for referral was musculoskeletal or cardiovascular risk. Overall, 79 per cent attended at least the first appointment, with statistically significant predictors by age and reason for referral. Those referred for ‘fitness’ or ‘mental health’ were most likely to attend. Patients in the youngest and oldest age groups were least likely to attend. Patient’s sex and deprivation and the number of patients referred by each general practice did not influence attendance.
Conclusions Primary-care patients seem to view the concept of exercise referral schemes positively but practitioners remain reluctant to refer many of their sedentary patients. There is doubt that exercise referral schemes like this will influence population levels of sedentary behaviour, when considered alongside their impact on physical activity in the longer term.
Keywords: exercise referall, exercise on prescription, physical activity, health promotion
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Gidlow, L. H. Johnston, D. Crone, and D. V. B. James State of the Art Reviews: Methods of Evaluation: Issues and Implications for Physical Activity Referral Schemes American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 46 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Gidlow, L. H. Johnston, D. Crone, C. Morris, A. Smith, C. Foster, and D. V.B. James Socio-demographic patterning of referral, uptake and attendance in Physical Activity Referral Schemes J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2007; 29(2): 107 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|