Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on January 25, 2006
Journal of Public Health 2006 28(1):49-55; doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi075
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improving health through neighbourhood environmental change: are we speaking the same language? A qualitative study of views of different stakeholders
Tanya Trayers
Tanya Trayers, Research Assistant, Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
Rosemary Deem
Rosemary Deem, Professor of Education, Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, UK
Kenneth R. Fox
Kenneth R. Fox, Professor of Exercise and Health Sciences, Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
Chris J. Riddoch
Chris J. Riddoch, Professor, Head of London Sport Institute, London Institute for Sport and Exercise, Middlesex University, UK
Andy R. Ness
Andy R. Ness, Consultant Senior Lecturer and Deputy Director of ALSPAC, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, Department of Community-Based Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
Debbie A. Lawlor
Debbie A. Lawlor, Consultant Senior Lecturer, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
Address correspondence to Tanya Trayers. Email: t.trayers{at}bristol.ac.uk
Objective To explore the perspectives of four groups of stakeholders to proposed improvements to the built environmenta neighbourhood renewal consisting of a home zone development and an extension of the National Cycle Network (NCN).
Design Qualitative focus group study.
Setting A deprived neighbourhood.
Sample Four focus groups were conducted with 10 residents from the neighbourhood undergoing change, nine pupils from a local primary school, 10 students and tutors from a local further education college and three local authority planners overseeing the developments.
Results We identified four main themes relating to the impact of environmental change. These were safety, space, antisocial behaviour and physical activity and health, the latter being the least important to all groups. A mismatch regarding environmental change emerged in perspectives between different stakeholders. The residents were most concerned about home and car (parking) safety and in particular felt that the new cycle/walk way would reduce their safety, whereas the planners felt that the environmental change would provide a safer and healthier environment for the residents.
Conclusion The assumption that planned provision of supportive environments will improve levels of physical activity, health and lifestyle may not be true if the developments do not take account of community concerns regarding personal safety.
Keywords: environmental change, focus groups, physical activity