Skip Navigation


Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on August 10, 2006
Journal of Public Health 2006 28(3):203-208; doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdl022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/203    most recent
fdl022v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ott, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ott, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved.

Recreation for children on social assistance, 4–17 years old, pays for itself the same year



Marilyn Ott, Lecturer1

Gina Browne, Professor1

Carolyn Byrne, Professor and Dean2

Jacqueline Roberts, Professor Emeritus1

Amiram Gafni, Professor3

Amanda H. Bateman, Level 4 Nursing Student1
1 School of Nursing, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, HSC-2J21, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5
2 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada L1H 7K4
3 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, System Linked Research Unit: Health and Social Service Utilization, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, HSC-2J21, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5

Address correspondence to Marilyn Ott, E-mail: ottm{at}mcmaster.ca

A randomized control trial completed in the Hamilton-Wentworth and Halton regions of Ontario, Canada, was created to assess the effects and expense of age-appropriate provider-initiated and subsidized versus self-directed and self-financed methods of recreation. Upon completion, this study proved that the annual per-person expenditure for the subsidized, quality recreation paid for itself by children’s lower use of healthcare and social services. The children within the subsidized recreation group had lower use of physician, physiotherapy, probation, children’s aid society, social work, psychologist and services in comparison with those in the non-subsidized group. The subsidized group also proved to be beneficial for the parents as well. The use of health and social services, by the parents in the subsidized group, was also decreased in comparison with those of the self-financed group. This group also proved to have improvement of the global socioeconomic status, with a 10% greater exit from the social assistance program within 1 year.

Keywords: cost, single parents, social assistance, subsidized recreation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.