Skip Navigation


Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on May 22, 2007
Journal of Public Health 2007 29(3):275-280; doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdm020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/3/275    most recent
fdm020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, M.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved

Cumulative attendance, assessment and cancer detection rate over four screening rounds in five English breast-screening programmes: a retrospective study



Matthew Wallis, Consultant Radiologist1,

Fergus Neilson, QA Co-ordinator2

Helen Hogarth, Research assistant2

Caroline Whitaker, Audit Officer2

Keith Faulkner, QA Director2
1 Breast Screening Unit, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
2 North East, Yorkshire and the Humber Quality Assurance Reference Centre, 9 Kings way, Silverlink Business Park, Wallsend, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE28 9ND, United Kingdom

Address correspondence to Matthew Wallis, E-mail: mgwallis12{at}aol.com


  Abstract

Background Data collection in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme monitors performance in a different cohort of women each year.

Methods This paper follows a single cohort study of 57 425 women (aged 50–53, when first invited) over four screening rounds to find: how many women attend screening and how often; how many were assessed; how many times they were assessed; and the number of cancers detected at each round.

Results Average attendance in each round was 76.9% and has remained constant. Only 62% of women have attended all four rounds, but 89.9% have been screened at least once, the average number of attendances being 3.5. Average assessment rate decreased from 7.3 to 3.5%. A total of 11.3% of women were assessed once, 0.91% twice and 0.06% three times. Cancer detection rates have more than doubled from 3.3 per 1000 screened to 6.9.

Conclusions Current monitoring shows constant uptake over time, but when looking at a cohort of individual woman, a much larger percentage have 'ever' attended and a smaller number have attended all invitations. The chance of a woman being assessed at all, if she attends all four rounds, is 12.3%, which can be calculated by summating the recall rates in each round.

Keywords: public health, screening


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.