Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1985 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Screening for syphilis in pregnancy: An assessment of the costs and benefits


Keith Williams

North Staffordshire Health Authority Windsor House, 223 Princes Road, Hartshill, Stoke on Trent ST4 7JW

The substantial decline in the incidence of syphilis, especially in women, in Western Countries since 1945 has led some to question the desirability of continuing routine antenatal serological screening for syphilis in pregnancy. No routine figures are available in England with regard to the incidence of maternal syphilis.

The incidence of syphilis in pregnancy was estimated for 1981 by means of a postal questionnaire sent to all the Special Clinics in England, and the costs and benefits of the screening programme were calculated by means of a computer-aided program which included a sensitivity analysis.

Under various assumptions, the total cost savings from discontinuing screening ranged from £170479 to £325493 per annum, with a ‘best estimate’ of £252713. Benefits in terms of cost savings to the N.H.S. resulting from the screening programme ranged from £1870705 to £6975587 per annum, with a ‘best estimate’ of £5121950.

When other benefits to society of the programme were considered, total benefits ranged from £3243845 to £14121160 per annum with a ‘best estimate’ of £8322610 per annum.

The benefit/cost ratio ranged from 9.20 to 1 to 82.83 to 1 with a ‘best estimate’ of 32.93 to 1.

It is concluded that, on economic grounds, there is a strong argument for continuing to screen routinely for syphilis in pregnancy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.