Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on June 26, 2009
Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdp060
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under-reporting of tobacco use among Bangladeshi women in England
Marilyn A. Roth, Research Associate1
Amina Aitsi-Selmi, Academic Clinical Fellow2
Heather Wardle, Research Director3
Jennifer Mindell, Clinical Senior Lecturer4
1 Health and Social Surveys Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
3 National Centre for Social Research, London, UK
4 Health and Social Surveys Group, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Address correspondence to Marilyn A. Roth, E-mail: m.roth{at}ucl.ac.uk.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Background This study investigates the prevalence of under-reported use of tobacco among Bangladeshi women and the characteristics of this group.
Methods The 1999 and 2004 Health Survey for England included 996 Bangladeshi women aged 16 years and above, 302 with a valid saliva sample and 694 without. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of under-reported tobacco use.
Results Fifteen per cent of Bangladeshi women with a saliva sample under-reported their personal tobacco use. Under-reporters were very similar to self-reported users except for being much more likely to report chewing paan without tobacco (47% versus 9%, P < 0.001). Under-reporters differed significantly from cotinine-validated non-users in most respects. Regression analyses confirmed that under-reporters and self-reported users were similar in age, education level and exposure to passive smoking. Under-reporters were older and less educated than cotinine-validated non-users. Both self-reported users [odds ratio (OR): 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04–0.30] and cotinine-validated non-users (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.89) were far less likely to report chewing paan without tobacco compared with under-reporters.
Conclusions Contrary to our a priori hypothesis, under-reporters were not young, British-born, English-speaking women likely to be concealing smoking but resembled self-reported tobacco users except for being much more likely to report chewing paan without tobacco.