Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jefferies, S.
Right arrow Articles by Beardow, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jefferies, S.
Right arrow Articles by Beardow, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

other

Low immunization uptake rates in an inner-city health district: fact or fiction?


Sally Jefferies, Researcher
Sylvia McShane, Health Visitor
Juliet Oerton, Researcher
Christina R. Victor, Research Unit Director
Rosemary Beardow, Consultant in Public Health Medicine

Research Unit, Department of Public Health Bay 8, 16 South Wharf Road, London W2 IPF


Address correspondence to S. Jefferies.

Immunization uptake rates are assuming considerable importance as performance indicators for district health authorities (DHAs) and general practitioners (GPs). Data from the Cover of Vaccination Evaluated Rapidly (COVER) programme suggest that immunization uptake rates in innercity districts are well below the 90 per cent target. Using Parkside DHA, a district with consistently poor uptake, as an example, this paper has examined the accuracy of the Child Health Computer (CHC) records on which the COVER figures are based. In October 1989 a cohort of 1485 children born between April and June 1988 were identified. The 462 children identified by the CHC as immunization defaulters (using diphtheria and tetanus immunizations) were followed up by contacting child health clinics, GP surgeries and parents. This exercise revealed that 195 children were in fact immunized and 176 children were erroneously listed, largely because they were no longer resident at the address given. Only a small proportion of this information had reached the CHC by the end of the follow-up period. In addition to high population mobility, information inaccuracies appeared to be caused partly by a failure in data transfer between GPs and the DHA and by failures in data transfer between districts. Overall, the results of the study suggest that there is a considerable discrepancy between actual and recorded immunization uptake levels in Parkside and probably other inner-city areas. This will have a considerable impact on GPs and other health professionals who are striving to achieve 90 per cent targets.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.