Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sims, A.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sims, A.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

research-article

Funding a primary care led NHS: achieving a model for more equitable allocation of healthcare resources at a sub-district level


Anita Sims
, Epidemiologist
Paul Redgrave
, Consultant in Public Health
Andy Layzell
, Director of Community Affairs
Mike Grimsley
, Principal Lecturer in Statistics, School of Computing and Management Science
Steve Wisher
, Head of the Survey and Statatistical Research Center
David Martin
, Head of Health Policy and Management

Doncaster Health Authority White Rose House, Ten Pound Walk, Doncaster DN4 5DJ
Rotherhan Health Authority, 220 Badsley Moor Lann, Rotherhan S65 2QU
North Derbyshire Health Scarsdale, Newbold Road, Chesterfield S41 7Pf
Sheffield Hallam University Hallamshire Business Park, Napire Street, Sheffield S11 8HD
Sheffield Center for Health and Related Research Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 5DA


Address correspondence to Anita Sims

BACKGROUND: Current resource allocation for health services have developed in a haphazard and inequitable way. This project aimed to determine a fairer and more rational way to distribute health authority's (HA's) money to general practitioners (GPs).

METHODS: A dataset was developed to examine the way resources were spent on patients at the level of general practice. Important managerial aspects of the project were addressed. This involved the establishment of the ‘Equity Group’ of GPs to work with the HA. The group sought a measure of health need that was rigorous and scientifically based but was also practical and politically acceptable to GPs and the HA. The York Relative Needs Index (RNI) was chosen, and applied to populations at practice level. An implementation plan was then developed by the Equity Group.

RESULTS: Results demonstrated considerable inequalities between practices in age-adjusted use of healthcare resources. There was low correlation between the level of need in practices and the per capita expenditure. Applying the York RNI to practice populations indicated current practice allocations were within the range 82–126 per cent of their needs-based target. The managerial implications of the proposed changes are described.

CONCLUSIONS: The new methods for resource allocation appear to be an advance on the unplanned methods which have evolved. Full evaluation of the long-term results of redistributing health resources will be needed. Important aspects of this project were the participation of GPs and general development of the concept of equity in North Derbyshire.

Keywords: equity, resource allocation, general practice, measures of need, York Relative Needs Index


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Majeed and L. Malcolm
Unified budgets for primary care groups
BMJ, March 20, 1999; 318(7186): 772 - 776.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.