Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleeman, N
Right arrow Articles by Scott-Samuel, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleeman, N
Right arrow Articles by Scott-Samuel, A
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2000 Faculty of Public Health Medicine of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

A prospective health impact assessment of the Merseyside Integrated Transport Strategy (MerITS)


N Fleeman
A Scott-Samuelz

Liverpool Public Health Observatory, Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK
z Corresponding author
E-mail: alexss@liverpool.ac.uk


  Abstract

Background.Prospective health impact assessment is a new approach to predicting potential health impacts of policies, programmes or projects. It has been widely recognized that public policies have important impacts on health. In 1997, the Liverpool Public Health Observatory was commissioned to carry out a health impact assessment of the Merseyside Integrated Transport Strategy (MerITS). A secondary aim was to pilot a method for health impact assessment at the strategic level.

Method.The methods used drew on previous health impact assessments of projects, on strategic environmental assessment, and on policy research. They included policy analysis, semi-structured interviews with key informants and literature searches.

Results.Four priority impact areas of MerITS were identified: establishing road hierarchies, economic viability, air quality, and public transport. Potential health impacts in each of these areas were estimated, and recommendations were made to minimize the effects of negative impacts and to enhance positive ones.

Conclusion.This health impact assessment prospectively identified the key health impacts of a strategy on a defined population and made recommendations to maximize potential positive and minimize potential negative health impacts. The methods employed are generally applicable to prospective health impact assessments of public policies and strategies.

Keywords: health impact assessment, public policy, transport policy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Law Med EthicsHome page
E. O'Keefe and A. Scott-Samuel
Human Rights and Wrongs: Could Health Impact Assessment Help?
J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2002; 30(4): 734 - 738.
[PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.