Skip Navigation

Journal of Public Health 2004 26(3):285-287; doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdh148
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boxall, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boxall, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Public Health 26(3) © Faculty of Public Health 2004; all rights reserved.

Antenatal screening for HIV; are those who refuse testing at higher risk than those who accept testing?



Elizabeth H. Boxall
, Consultant Clinical Scientist

Neil Smith
, Consultant Haematologist
National Blood Service, Vincent Drive, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2SG, UK.

Address correspondence to Elizabeth Boxall. E-mail: elizabeth.boxall{at}nbs.nhs.uk

Background The UK Department of Health recommends that all pregnant women are offered screening for infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and had encouraged maternity units to achieve uptake targets of 90 per cent by the end of 2002. Many maternity units fail to meet this target and there is concern that those women who are still refusing testing may include a higher proportion of women at high risk of infection. In consequence, those infected with HIV are not being identified and are not receiving the antiviral treatment, which would be of benefit to them and reduce the risk of transmission of HIV to their babies.

Methods A retrospective audit of HIV screening uptake in women who were found to be infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and in those who were not infected with HBV was carried out in order to explore further the characteristics of ‘acceptors’ and ‘refusers’ of HIV screening.

Results The overall uptake rate of HIV screening in the West Midlands population served by the National Blood Service was 60 per cent in 2001 and 74 per cent in 2002. The prevalence of HBV infection was found to be twice as high (0.39 per cent) in those who had refused an HIV test compared with those who had accepted a test (0.21 per cent) (p = 0.022).

Conclusion There is good evidence that women refusing HIV antenatal screening have a higher prevalence of another blood-borne virus, indicating clearly that further effort must be made to increase the screening uptake and fully integrate HIV screening with other antenatal tests.

Keywords: HIV, antenatal screening, blood-borne viruses, hepatitis B, prevalence of infection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.