Skip Navigation


Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on October 18, 2005
Journal of Public Health 2005 27(4):366-370; doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/4/366    most recent
fdi060v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vardy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Judge, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vardy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Judge, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved.

Can knowledge protect against acute mountain sickness?



Jennifer Vardy
Jennifer Vardy, SHO III, Accident and Emergency Department, Wishaw General Hospital, Lanarkshire ML2 0DP, Scotland


John Vardy
John Vardy, Temporary Research Assistant, Accident and Emergency Department, Wishaw General Hospital, Lanarkshire ML2 0DP, Scotland


Ken Judge
Ken Judge, Professor of Public Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ, Scotland

Address correspondence to Jennifer Vardy. Email: jenvardy{at}doctors.net.uk

Background Studies show that the well-prepared traveller is less likely to suffer travel related illness. This study is designed to examine trekkers’ knowledge of altitude sickness in an attempt to see whether knowledge can protect against acute mountain sickness (AMS) and high altitude pulmonary or cerebral oedema (HAPE/HACE).

Methods A convenience sample of 130 trekkers were interviewed in the Solu Khumbu region of Nepal. They were asked what action they would take firstly if they developed symptoms of AMS, and secondly, symptoms of HAPE/HACE whilst ascending. Options were to continue up, stay at the same altitude, descend or ask their guide.

Results With symptoms of moderate to severe AMS, 37 trekkers (28 per cent) indicated they would continue their ascent while 113 (72 per cent) would not. Those individuals who proposed continued ascent were significantly more likely to be suffering from symptoms of AMS (p = 0.025) and had ascended significantly more rapidly over the preceding 72 h (p = 0.004) then those who proposed to halt their ascent. With regard to symptoms of HAPE/HACE, 12 (9 per cent) indicated they would not descend, demonstrating no association with AMS (p = 0.07) or ascent in preceding 72 h (p = 0.7).

Conclusion Trekkers who indicated that they would act safely in the event of developing moderate to severe AMS were significantly less likely to be suffering from AMS when interviewed and had ascended significantly less altitude in the preceding 72 h being more likely to adhere to recommended ascent guidelines.

Keywords: acute mountain sickness, altitude sickness, ascent guidelines, knowledge


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.