Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on January 25, 2006
Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi066
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/1/43    most recent
fdi066v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palis, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hossain, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palis, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hossain, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved

Article

Our farmers at risk: behaviour and belief system in pesticide safety

Florencia G. Palis 1 *, Rica Joy Flor 1, Hilary Warburton 2, and Mahabub Hossain 1

1 International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Laguna, Philippines
2 Intermediate Technology Development Group

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Florencia G. Palis, E-mail: f.palis{at}cgiar.org


  Abstract

Background The study was done in three villages in Nueva Ecija, Philippines. It surveys farmers’ belief system and pesticide practices relative to health and safety.

Methods Initially it used a simulated market study on willingness to pay for personal protective equipment in the form of gloves and masks. Then a combination of semi-structured, formal, informal, and key-informant interviews, as well as focus groups, and field observations was done intermittently in a span of approximately 12 years.

Results The farmers perceive illness in terms of inability to function. Pesticide to them may not be a threat because (i) they are immune, (ii) it is regarded as a medicine that is needed by the plants rather than poison, and (iii) exposure is only through inhalation and ingestion not through dermal contact. Added to that, they put value on pasma, and try to prevent it at the cost of exposure to pesticides. These perceptions lead to their practices showing inadequate protection.

Conclusion There is the need for more health education programs that tap farmers’ belief system and cognitive categories to stress the need for precautions.

Keywords: illness, pasma, personal protective equipment, pesticides.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.