Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on January 25, 2006
Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi075
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/1/49    most recent
fdi075v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trayers, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lawlor, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trayers, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lawlor, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved.

Article

Improving health through neighbourhood environmental change: are we speaking the same language? A qualitative study of views of different stakeholders

Tanya Trayers 1 *, Rosemary Deem 2, Kenneth R. Fox 1, Chris J. Riddoch 3, Andy R. Ness 4, and Debbie A. Lawlor 5

1 Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
2 Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, UK
3 London Institute for Sport and Exercise, Middlesex University, UK
4 Department of Community-Based Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
5 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tanya Trayers, E-mail: t.trayers{at}bristol.ac.uk


  Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore the perspectives of four groups of stakeholders to proposed improvements to the built environment--a neighbourhood renewal consisting of a home zone development and an extension of the National Cycle Network (NCN).

Design Qualitative focus group study.

Setting A deprived neighbourhood.

Sample Four focus groups were conducted with 10 residents from the neighbourhood undergoing change, nine pupils from a local primary school, 10 students and tutors from a local further education college and three local authority planners overseeing the developments.

Results We identified four main themes relating to the impact of environmental change. These were safety, space, antisocial behaviour and physical activity and health, the latter being the least important to all groups. A mismatch regarding environmental change emerged in perspectives between different stakeholders. The residents were most concerned about home and car (parking) safety and in particular felt that the new cycle/walk way would reduce their safety, whereas the planners felt that the environmental change would provide a safer and healthier environment for the residents.

Conclusion The assumption that planned provision of supportive environments will improve levels of physical activity, health and lifestyle may not be true if the developments do not take account of community concerns regarding personal safety.

Keywords: environmental change, focus groups, physical activity.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.