Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on April 26, 2006
Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdl005
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/2/157    most recent
fdl005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knowles, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knowles, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved.

Article

Using multiple sources to improve and measure case ascertainment in surveillance studies: 20 years of the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit

Rachel L. Knowles 1 *, Alan Smith 2, Richard Lynn 3, Jugnoo S. Rahi 1, and on behalf of the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU)

1 Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK
2 Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London NW9 5HT, UK
3 British Paediatric Surveillance Unit of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, London W1W 6DE, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Rachel L. Knowles, E-mail: r.knowles{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk


  Abstract

Background The British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU) was established in 1986 to facilitate national surveillance of uncommon paediatric disorders. This study investigated the effectiveness of using multiple source reporting and capture-recapture analysis to maximize case ascertainment in studies undertaken through the BPSU.

Methods Structured review of all surveillance studies completed through the BPSU. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of multiple reporting sources and capture-recapture methods was made.

Results Of 71 studies undertaken through the BPSU, 59 were included in this review and 38 used additional data sources. Established national sources were most readily adapted for use as secondary data sources, including routine health data, communicable disease and specialty-specific surveillance units, whilst the involvement of parent groups and the media was less successful. Six studies employed capture-recapture techniques to estimate the completeness of case ascertainment.

Conclusions Active surveillance through the BPSU remains a timely and reliable primary source of cases, but employing additional reporting sources is effective in enhancing case ascertainment. When the assumptions for its valid use are met, capture-recapture analysis allows the estimation of completeness of ascertainment. It is essential to define the purpose of an additional source at the outset of a study and to ensure that subsequent analysis is appropriate.

Keywords: British Paediatric Surveillance Unit, BPSU, capture-recapture, case ascertainment, paediatric, surveillance.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.