Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on July 10, 2006
Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdl026
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/248    most recent
fdl026v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tookey, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tookey, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved

Article

Uptake of antenatal HIV testing in the United Kingdom: 2000-2003

Claire L. Townsend 1, Susan Cliffe 1, and Pat A. Tookey 1 *

1 Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pat A. Tookey, E-mail: p.tookey{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk


  Abstract

Background A policy for routine antenatal HIV testing was introduced in England in 1999, with uptake targets for 2000 and 2002; similar policies were subsequently introduced throughout the UK.

Methods Date of implementation of the policy and data for estimating annual uptake of testing 2000-2003 were collected through postal survey of unit-based obstetric respondents to the National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood (NSHPC).

Results Implementation date was reported for every unit; uptake data were provided for about three-quarters of implementing units each year. The policy was implemented in 78% (152/195) of English units by end of 2000; 78% (89/114) of units providing data achieved at least 50% uptake that year. By 2002, almost one-third (46/151) of English units reported 90% uptake or more, and over half (84/151) 80%. All but three UK units introduced the policy by the end of 2003, and of those providing adequate uptake data, 38% (66/175) reported at least 90% uptake and 69% (121/175) at least 80%; however, 19% (41/216) of respondents still had difficulty providing adequate data for estimating uptake.

Conclusions High uptake of HIV testing was reported from most UK units for 2003, but simple, robust and uniform methods for monitoring uptake at local and regional levels are still required.

Keywords: epidemiology, screening.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.