Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on September 14, 2006
Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdl056
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/4/324    most recent
fdl056v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Connor, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Connor, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved

Article

Relationship between constituent labelling and reporting of tar yields among smokers in four countries

R. J. O’Connor 1, L. T. Kozlowski 2, R. Borland 3, D. Hammond 4, and A. McNeill 5 *

1 Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
2 Department of Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, 435 Kimball Tower, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
3 Department of Cancer Prevention, The Cancer Council Victoria, 1 Rathdowne Street, Carlton Victoria 3053, Australia
4 Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, 200 West University Ave, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
5 Department of Health Policy & Promotion, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
A. McNeill, E-mail: richard.oconnor{at}roswellpark.org


  Abstract

Countries have adopted different approaches to disseminating cigarette tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide (CO) levels to consumers, with some (e.g. EU member states, Canada, Australia, but not the United States) requiring disclosure of results from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) test method on packs. Cross-country comparisons can provide insight into how smokers use yields when information is presented differently. We examined whether smokers in four different countries could recall the tar yield of their brand of cigarettes, using data from the third wave of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey (ITC-4). Of current smokers in the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom, 33.6% gave a numeric response when asked to report the tar yield of their brand, whereas 66.4% responded ‘I don’t know.’ American participants (9.2%) were less likely than Canadian (28.0%), UK (36.5%) or Australian (68.2%) smokers to give an answer, even after controlling for sociodemographic and smoking behaviour factors. Constituent labelling policies can affect whether smokers report a tar yield for their cigarette brand. Pack labelling appears to be useful for conveying information about cigarettes to smokers; however, there is an urgent need to develop more meaningful information on toxic constituents of cigarette smoke.

Keywords: cigarette, labeling, tar, tobacco.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.