Skip Navigation



Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on February 27, 2007

Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdm007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/2/173    most recent
fdm007v2
fdm007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webster, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webster, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved

Does the English Breast Screening Programme's information leaflet improve women's knowledge about mammography screening? A before and after questionnaire survey


Premila Webster
, Honorary Senior Lecturer

Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Rd, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK


Address correspondence to Premila Webster, E-mail: premila.webster{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk

Objectives To explore whether the English Breast Screening Programme's leaflet improved women's knowledge of breast cancer screening.

Design Before and after postal questionnaire survey.

Participants A random sample of 100 women aged between 49 and 64 years registered with GPs in Oxfordshire on whom data from a prospective, questionnaire survey was available on knowledge and perception of breast cancer screening.

Results Women's knowledge of lifetime risk had improved significantly (p < 0.0001) after the leaflet; however, the ‘qualitative’ interpretation of this numeric risk varied. The proportion of women who said the purpose of screening was to enable simpler treatments had increased from 34 to 45% (p = 0.05). Thirty-two per cent who had previously responded that screening prevented breast cancer now responded correctly; 20% who responded correctly before the leaflet now responded incorrectly. None of the women thought that all screen-detected cancers could be cured; 95% of the women said they were very likely to attend breast screening if invited, and the rest said they were ‘fairly likely’ to attend. Additional information women wanted included: what causes breast cancer; percentage rates for survival with and without mammograms; and lifestyle advice on how to avoid breast cancer.

Conclusions Although the leaflet had improved women's knowledge of the purpose of screening in some areas, some simple messages in the leaflet had not been understood by all women.

Keywords: Breast cancer screening, information leaflets, mammography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.